Home My Page Projects Code Snippets Project Openings diderot
Summary Activity Tracker Tasks SCM

SCM Repository

[diderot] View of /trunk/doc/probe/paper.tex
ViewVC logotype

View of /trunk/doc/probe/paper.tex

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log


Revision 288 - (download) (as text) (annotate)
Fri Aug 13 22:25:53 2010 UTC (8 years, 7 months ago) by jhr
File size: 12156 byte(s)
  Added kernel definition
\documentclass[11pt]{article}

\input{defs}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{listings}
\lstset{
  basicstyle=\ttfamily\footnotesize,
  keywordstyle=\bfseries,
  showstringspaces=false,
}
\lstdefinelanguage{OpenCL}[]{C}{%
  morekeywords={
    char2,char4,char8,char16,
    uchar2,uchar4,uchar8,uchar16,
    short2,short4,short8,short16,
    ushort2,ushort4,ushort8,ushort16,
    int2,int4,int8,int16,
    uint2,uint4,uint8,uint16,
    long2,long4,long8,long16,
    ulong2,ulong4,ulong8,ulong16,
    float2,float4,float8,float16,
    ufloat2,ufloat4,ufloat8,ufloat16,
    double2,double4,double8,double16,
    udouble2,udouble4,udouble8,udouble16,
    constant,__constant,kernel,__kernel,private,__private},
  moredirectives={version},
  deletekeywords={}
}

\lstset{
  language=C,
}

\setlength{\textwidth}{6in}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.25in}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.25in}
\setlength{\parskip}{5pt}

\newcommand{\matM}{\mathbf{M}}
\newcommand{\vecx}{\mathbf{x}}
\newcommand{\vecp}{\mathbf{p}}
\newcommand{\vecn}{\mathbf{n}}
\newcommand{\vecf}{\mathbf{f}}
\newcommand{\VEC}[1]{\left\langle{#1}\right\rangle}
\newcommand{\FLOOR}[1]{\left\lfloor{#1}\right\rfloor}

\title{Compiling probe operations for Diderot}
\author{
 John Reppy \\
  University of Chicago \\
  {\small\tt{}jhr@cs.uchicago.edu} \\
}
\date{\today}

\begin{document}

\maketitle
\thispagestyle{empty}

\bibliographystyle{../common/alpha}
\bibliography{../common/strings-short,../common/manticore}

\section{Introduction}

This note describes the code needed to implement a probe of a field operation.
In the discussion below, we  use a number of notational conventions that are
summarized in the following table:
\begin{center}
  \begin{tabular}{cp{4in}}
    $V$ & the image data \\
    $F$ & the field reconstructed from $V$ \\
    $\vecp$ & the position vector in field-space \\
    $\vecx$ & the position vector in image-space \\
    $\matM^{-1}$ & homogeneous matrix that represents the transformation from world space to image space \\
    $h$ & a piecewise polynomial convolution kernel \\
    $s$ & the support of $h$ \\
    $h_0,\,\ldots,h_{2s-1}$ & the polynomials that make up $h$ \\
  \end{tabular}%
\end{center}%

\section{Probing a 1D scalar field}
The simplest case is probing a 1D scalar field $F = V\circledast{}h$, where $s$ is the support
of $h$.
The probe $F\mkw{@}p$ is computed as follows:
\begin{eqnarray*}
  \left[\begin{array}{c} x \\ 1 \end{array}\right] & = & \matM^{-1} \left[\begin{array}{c} p \\ 1 \end{array}\right] \qquad \text{\textit{transform to image space}} \\
  n  & = & \FLOOR{x} \qquad \text{\textit{integer part of position}} \\
  f  & = & x - f \qquad \text{\textit{fractional part of position}} \\
  F\mkw{@}p & = & \sum_{i=1-s}^s {V(n+i) h(f - i)}
\end{eqnarray*}%
Note that the coordinate system of the convolution filter is flipped (negated) from the coordinate system
of the image; this property is why we evaluate $h(f-i)$ for $V(n+i)$.
The convolution $h$ is represented as a symmetric piecewise polynomial formed
from $2s$ polynomials $h_1,\,\ldots,\,h_{2s}$.
\begin{displaymath}
  h(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ll}
    0 & \text{$x \leq -s$ or $s \leq x$} \\
    h_{\lfloor{}x\rfloor{}+s}(x) & \text{$-s < x < s$} \\
  \end{array}\right.
\end{displaymath}%
Thus, we can rewrite the probe computation as
\begin{displaymath}
  F\mkw{@}x = \sum_{i=1-s}^{s} {V(n+i) h_{s-i}(i - f)}
\end{displaymath}%
\figref{fig:1d-probe} illustrates the situation for a kernel $h$ with support $s = 2$,
and \figref{fig:1d-probe-code} gives the C code for the probe operation, assuming that
$h$ is represented by third-degree polynomials.
\begin{figure}[t]
  \begin{center}
    \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{pictures/convo}
  \end{center}%
  \caption{1D scalar probe}
  \label{fig:1d-probe}
\end{figure}%

\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{quote}
\lstset{language=C}
\begin{lstlisting}
double V[];			// image data
double h[4][4] = {		// bspln3
	{ 1.33333,   2.0,  1.0,  0.166667 },   // -2 .. -1
	{ 0.666667,  0.0, -1.0, -0.5 },        // -1 .. 0
	{ 0.666667,  0.0, -1.0,  0.5 },        //  0 .. 1
	{ 1.33333,  -2.0,  1.0, -0.166667 },   //  1 .. 2
    }

double probe (double p)
{
  double x = transform(p);	// image-space position
  double n, f;	

  f = modf (x, &n);

  double value = 0.0, t;

  t = f + 1.0;
  value += V[n-1] * (h[3][0] + t*(h[3][1] + t*(h[3][2] + t*h[3][3])));
  t = f;
  value += V[n]   * (h[2][0] + t*(h[2][1] + t*(h[2][2] + t*h[2][3])));
  t = f - 1.0;
  value += V[n+1] * (h[1][0] + t*(h[1][1] + t*(h[1][2] + t*h[1][3])));
  t = f - 2.0;
  value += V[n+2] * (h[0][0] + t*(h[0][1] + t*(h[0][2] + t*h[0][3])));

  return value;
}
\end{lstlisting}%
\end{quote}%
\caption{Computing $F\mkw{@}x$ for a 1D scalar field in C}
\label{fig:1d-probe-code}
\end{figure}
If we look at the four lines that define \texttt{value}, we see an opportunity for
using SIMD parallelism to speed the computation.
\figref{fig:1d-probe-code-opencl} gives the OpenCL for for the probe function, where
we have lifted the kernel coefficients into the vector constants \texttt{a}, \texttt{b},
\texttt{c}, and \texttt{d}, and put the \texttt{t} values into a vector too.
We then use a dot product to compute the sum of the products of the
convolution-filter values and the image values.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{quote}
\lstset{language=OpenCL}
\begin{lstlisting}
double4 d = (double4)(h[3][0], h[2][0], h[1][0], h[0][0]); // x^0 coeffs
double4 c = (double4)(h[3][1], h[2][1], h[2][1], h[0][1]); // x^1 coeffs
double4 b = (double4)(h[3][2], h[2][2], h[1][2], h[0][2]); // x^2 coeffs
double4 a = (double4)(h[3][3], h[2][3], h[1][3], h[0][3]); // x^3 coeffs

double probe (double p)
{
  double x = transform(p);	// image-space position
  double n, f;	

  f = modf (x, &n);

  double4 v = (double4)(V[n-1], V[n], V[n+1], V[n+2]);
  double4 t = (double4)(f + 1.0, f, f - 1.0, f - 2.0);
  return dot(v, d + t*(c + t*(b + t*a)));
}
\end{lstlisting}%
\end{quote}%
\caption{Computing $F\mkw{@}x$ for a 1D scalar field in OpenCL}
\label{fig:1d-probe-code-opencl}
\end{figure}

\section{Probing a 3D scalar field}

The more common case is when the field is a convolution of a scalar 3-dimensional
field ($F = V\circledast{}h$).
Let  $s$ be the support of $h$.
Then the probe $F\mkw{@}\vecp$ is computed as follows:
\begin{eqnarray*}
  \vecx & = & \matM^{-1} \vecp \qquad \text{\textit{transform to image space}} \\
  \vecn & = & \FLOOR{\vecx} \qquad \text{\textit{integer part of position}} \\
  \vecf & = & \vecx - \vecn \qquad \text{\textit{fractional part of position}} \\
  F\mkw{@}\vecp & = & \sum_{i=1-s}^s {\sum_{j=1-s}^s {\sum_{k=1-s}^s {V(\vecn+\VEC{i,j,k}) h(\vecf_x - i) h(\vecf_y - j) h(\vecf_z - k)}}}
\end{eqnarray*}%
We can restructure this equation to highlight the loop-invariant computations.
\begin{displaymath}
  F\mkw{@}\vecp =
    \sum_{i=1-s}^s \left({
      \sum_{j=1-s}^s \left({
        \sum_{k=1-s}^s \left({
          V(\vecn+\VEC{i,j,k}) h(\vecf_z - k)
        }\right)
      }\right) h(\vecf_y - j)
    }\right) h(\vecf_x - i)
\end{displaymath}%
Thus, we see that the kernel $h$ is evaluated $2s$ times per axis (\ie{}, $6s$ times in 3D).
\figref{fig:3d-probe-code-c} gives C code for this operation.
\begin{figure}[p]
\begin{quote}
\lstset{language=C}
\begin{lstlisting}
typedef double vec3[3];

double V[][][];		// image data
double h[4][4];		// bslpn3 (as before)
const int s = 2;       // kernel support

double probe (vec3 p)
{
  double x[3] = transform(p);	// image-space position
  double nx, ny, nz, fx, fy, fz;

  fx = modf (x[0], &nx);
  fy = modf (x[1], &ny);
  fz = modf (x[2], &nz);

  // compute kernel values for each axis
  double hx[4], hy[4], hz[4];
  for (int i = 1-s;  i < s;  i++) {
    double t;
    t = fx - i;
    hx[i+s-1] = h[s-i][0] + t*(h[s-i][1] + t*(h[s-i][2] + t*h[s-i][3]));
    t = fy - i;
    hy[i+s-1] = h[s-i][0] + t*(h[s-i][1] + t*(h[s-i][2] + t*h[s-i][3]));
    t = fz - i;
    hz[i+s-1] = h[s-i][0] + t*(h[s-i][1] + t*(h[s-i][2] + t*h[s-i][3]));
  }

  double vx = 0.0;
  for (int i = 1-s;  i <= s;  i++) {
    double vy = 0.0;
    for (int j = 1-s;  j <= s;  j++) {
      double vz = 0.0;
      for (int k = 1-s;  k <= s;  k++) {
      	vz += V[nx+i][ny+j][nz+k] * hz[k+s-1];
      }
      vy += vz * hy[j+s-1];
    }
    vx += vx * hx[i+s-1];
  }

  return vx;
}
\end{lstlisting}%
\end{quote}%
\caption{Computing $F\mkw{@}\vecx$ for a 3D scalar field in C}
\label{fig:3d-probe-code-c}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[p]
\begin{quote}
\lstset{language=OpenCL}
\begin{lstlisting}
double V[][][];		// image data
double h[4][4];		// kernel
const int s = 2;        // kernel support

double probe (double4 p)
{
  double4 x = transform(p);	// image-space position
  double4 n, f

  f = modf (x, &n);

  // compute kernel values for each axis
  double4 t, hx, hy, hz;
  t = (double4)(f.x +1, f.x, f.x - 1, f.x - 2);
  hx = d + t*(c + t*(b + t*a));
  t = (double4)(f.y +1, f.y, f.y - 1, f.y - 2);
  hy = d + t*(c + t*(b + t*a));
  t = (double4)(f.z +1, f.z, f.z - 1, f.z - 2);
  hz = d + t*(c + t*(b + t*a));

  double vy[4], vz[4];
  for (int i = 1-s;  i <= s;  i++) {
    for (int j = 1-s;  j <= s;  j++) {
      double4 v = (double4) (
          V[nx+i][ny+j][nz-1],
          V[nx+i][ny+j][nz],
          V[nx+i][ny+j][nz+1],
          V[nx+i][ny+j][nz+2]);
      vz[j+s-1] += dot(v, hz);
    }
    vy[i+s-1] = dot((double4)(vz[0], vz[1], vz[2], vz[3]), hy);
  }

  return dot((double4)(vy[0], vy[1], vy[2], vy[3]), hx);
}
\end{lstlisting}%
\end{quote}%
\caption{Computing $F\mkw{@}\vecx$ for a 3D scalar field in OpenCL}
\label{fig:3d-probe-code-opencl}
\end{figure}

\section{Probing a 3D derivative field}
We next consider the case of probing the derivative of a scalar field $F = V\circledast{}h$, where $s$ is the support
of $h$.
The probe $(\nabla F)\mkw{@}\vecp$ produces a vector result as follows:
\begin{eqnarray*}
  \vecx & = & \matM^{-1} \vecp \qquad \text{\textit{transform to image space}} \\
  \vecn & = & \FLOOR{\vecx} \qquad \text{\textit{integer part of position}} \\
  \vecf & = & \vecx - \vecn \qquad \text{\textit{fractional part of position}} \\
  (\nabla F)\mkw{@}\vecp & = & \left[\begin{array}{c}
    \sum_{i=1-s}^s {\sum_{j=1-s}^s {\sum_{k=1-s}^s {V(\vecn+\VEC{i,j,k}) h'(\vecf_x - i) h(\vecf_y - j) h(\vecf_z - k)}}} \\
    \sum_{i=1-s}^s {\sum_{j=1-s}^s {\sum_{k=1-s}^s {V(\vecn+\VEC{i,j,k}) h(\vecf_x - i) h'(\vecf_y - j) h(\vecf_z - k)}}} \\
    \sum_{i=1-s}^s {\sum_{j=1-s}^s {\sum_{k=1-s}^s {V(\vecn+\VEC{i,j,k}) h(\vecf_x - i) h(\vecf_y - j) h'(\vecf_z - k)}}} \\
  \end{array}\right]
\end{eqnarray*}%

\begin{figure}[p]
\begin{quote}
\lstset{language=C}
\begin{lstlisting}
double probe (vec3 p)
{
  double x[3] = transform(p);	// image-space position
  double nx, ny, nz, fx, fy, fz;

  fx = modf (x[0], &nx);
  fy = modf (x[1], &ny);
  fz = modf (x[2], &nz);

  // compute kernel values for each axis
  double hx[4], dhx[4], hy[4], dhy[4], hz[4], dhz[4];
  for (int i = 1-s;  i < s;  i++) {
    double t;
    t = fx - i;
    hx[i+s-1] = h[s-i][0] + t*(h[s-i][1] + t*(h[s-i][2] + t*h[s-i][3]));
    dhx[i+s-1] = h[s-i][1] + t*(2*h[s-i][2] + t*3*h[s-i][3]);
    t = fy - i;
    hy[i+s-1] = h[s-i][0] + t*(h[s-i][1] + t*(h[s-i][2] + t*h[s-i][3]));
    dhy[i+s-1] = h[s-i][1] + t*(2*h[s-i][2] + t*3*h[s-i][3]);
    t = fz - i;
    hz[i+s-1] = h[s-i][0] + t*(h[s-i][1] + t*(h[s-i][2] + t*h[s-i][3]));
    dhz[i+s-1] = h[s-i][1] + t*(2*h[s-i][2] + t*3*h[s-i][3]);
  }

  vec3 vx = {0, 0, 0};
  for (int i = 1-s;  i <= s;  i++) {
    vec3 vy = {0, 0, 0};
    for (int j = 1-s;  j <= s;  j++) {
      vec3 vz = {0, 0, 0};
      for (int k = 1-s;  k <= s;  k++) {
        double v = V[nx+i][ny+j][nz+k];
        vz[0] = v * hz[k+s-1];
        vz[1] = vz[0];
        vz[2] = v * dhz[k+s-1];
      }
      vy[0] += vz[0] * hy[j+s-1];
      vy[1] += vz[1] * dhy[j+s-1];
      vy[2] += vz[2] * hy[j+s-1];
    }
    vx[0] += vx[0] * dhx[i+s-1];
    vx[1] += vx[1] * hx[i+s-1];
    vx[2] += vx[2] * hx[i+s-1];
  }

  return vx;
}
\end{lstlisting}%
\end{quote}%
\caption{Computing $(\nabla F)\mkw{@}\vecx$ for a 3D scalar field in C}
\label{fig:3d-deriv-probe-code-c}
\end{figure}

\end{document}

root@smlnj-gforge.cs.uchicago.edu
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.0.0